Go with the flow
Published: Friday, May 17, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
The tenacity of the Allegheny River Development Corp. to keep local Allegheny River locks open during the height of the boating season is worthy of admiration.
Daunted by the high costs of necessary insurance to staff the locks with volunteers, the group is turning its efforts to raising donated funds to keep the chambers operating. It needs to raise about $115,000 to give to the Army Corps of Engineers to keep four locks open for the recreational season.
Someone could argue that the effort is merely to make life more fun for boaters in the warm weather months. Such an attitude would be very shortsighted. The river here is one of Armstrong County's most valuable economic-development assets and remains highly undervalued and underused.
Given the public's interest in hiking and biking (the trail along the river), along with kayaking, fishing and boating, the river is an Armstrong destination to promote.
We urge residents to offer suggestions on ways to use of our rich riparian virtues. Get involved.
Joining another effort
Politics has given itself a bad name. Its real name is problem-solving.
In the primary election Tuesday, Democrats and Republicans have the opportunity to select people in their hometowns who can work to lower taxes, find better ways to use what is taken in and — believe it or not — come up with creative ideas to inspire constituent involvement.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Nelson Mandela: The real legacy
- Detroit’s bankruptcy: An object lesson
- ‘China City’
- PSERS time bomb: Tick, tick, tick, tick ...
- Sunday pops
- More ObamaCare fallout: Medicare disadvantage
- Chaos in Venezuela: Maduro’s madness
- Anti-fracking scandal: More junk ‘science’
- The Box