American tyranny: Wanted — a remedy
“There is a remedy in human nature against tyranny that will keep us safe under every form of government,” Samuel Johnson reminded in “Boswell's Life.”
In Mr. Johnson's day, the late 1700s, if a sovereign — a monarch, a ruler, a king, a lord or a potentate — oppressed his people to a certain degree, they would rise to cut off his head. Given the events of the past week, we're starting to seriously wonder if America — all of it — has reached that “certain degree,” metaphorically speaking, of course.
Liberals and “progressives” were quite quick to dismiss the import of the revelation that the Internal Revenue Service had been targeting for bureaucratic hell those of a conservative bent. But with the revelation that the Justice Department went on a secret fishing expedition through the telephone records of The Associated Press — and has the effrontery to defend it with governmentspeak gobbledygook — many of those same liberals and “progressives” are having second thoughts about the role of government.
Heck, if the federal government keeps up this kind of behavior, even liberals and “progressives” will be singing the praises of the Second Amendment.
The Obama administration is running roughshod and amok over the very fabric of America. “Where law ends, tyranny begins,” William Pitt reminded in advance of the American Revolution. Or to take liberties with another quotation from Mr. Johnson, again from “Boswell”:
“No government power can be abused long. Americans will not bear it.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- The climate summit: Down for the count
- Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
- Saving RadioShack: Innovation vs. focus
- Greensburg Tuesday takes
- The medical device tax: An abject failure
- Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes
- The Scottish vote: Defeat as victory