ObamaCare lies: Shocking truths
A new House Energy & Commerce Committee report shows that when it comes to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's effects on insurance premiums, an old saying is on target: If something seems too good to be true, it probably is.
The report is based on 17 leading insurers' existing analyses of ObamaCare's likely effects once it's fully implemented. The new services, benefits and ratings and operation rules that ObamaCare requires for insurers, and the new taxes and fees it imposes, which insurers will pass on to consumers, will make health insurance anything but “affordable” for far too many Americans.
First-time individual policy buyers will see a total average increase of 96 percent in premiums; existing individual customers, an average rise of 73 percent. But individual premiums could rise as much as 413 percent — and Pennsylvanians can expect a 30-percent average increase.
In the small group — read: small business — market, premiums will rise as much as 50 percent, with a 27-percent hike expected in Pennsylvania.
And in the large group market, premiums for plans covering 50 or more people will rise 20 percent to 25 percent.
The president's claim that ObamaCare would “lower costs for families and businesses,” which the White House continues to repeat, is thus revealed as false — and a cynically deceptive political ploy that undermines the private insurance market, paving the way for a government takeover of health care.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- The revolving door: Washington’s ‘gift’
- U.N. Watch: Another jaded ‘inquiry’
- The regulatory state: EPA picks a fight
- Expanding Medicaid: Gov.-elect Wolf embraces a false premise
- Obama’s Cuba deal: More appeasement
- The Thursday wrap
- Holiday Gift Club: The spirit of the season
- Pension reform should not be linked to a natural gas extraction tax
- Ford City’s solution: Good side to cop cuts
- The Kathleen Kane chronicles: New and serious questions are being raised about the Pa. attorney general