Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, May 23, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
Lance: To Bill Peduto. The Democrats' newly minted nominee for Pittsburgh mayor — and given the Democrats' large registration edge, likely Pittsburgh's next mayor — says we need government to empower people and innovation. And here we thought government derives its power from the people and that the private sector is the best catalyst for innovation. Silly us.
Lance: To Mr. Peduto. He credits his mayoral primary victory to a “great message that resonated with a majority of the people of Pittsburgh.” Really? Peduto was elected by a quite small minority of the electorate that's a small minority of the population. That's always been the problem with “progressives” — they don't count very well.
Laurel: To Sue Means. Fifth District Allegheny County voters rejected spoils-system politics when they elected the Bethel Park Republican to serve out the remaining term of departed County Councilman Vince Gastgeb. She defeated Republican Krista Harris, appointed to the seat on an interim basis as a reward for a relative's work on another pol's campaign. Here's to voters who rejected such a machination.
Lance: To KDKA-FM. The sports station better known as Sports Radio 93.7 The Fan will hold open auditions to find a new on-air personality, “someone who can grow into a superstar.” But it says “participants will be judged ... on their ability to rant on a random sports topic.” Can sports radio be dumbed down any more? KDKA just did.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- The Obama/Biden visit: Oh, the irony
- Another IPCC warning: More sci-fi
- The Nevada standoff
- Greensburg Tuesday takes
- Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
- Alle-Kiski Tuesday Takes
- Paying the ObamaCare premium
- Extend jobless benefits? It’s counterproductive
- Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
- Saturday essay: Deck of dreams
- Vladimir the corrupt: Up the sanctions against Putin