Saturday essay: Passages
The early morning sky is deceiving as the final third of spring prepares for summer's advent.
As the first orange of the rising sun crests the horizon, illuminating the sharp and well-defined cumulus clouds, a wide and natural brush appears to have painted a tall and broad mountain range.
It's a fleeting mirage as the growing glow reveals the reality — the orange has turned decidedly reddish; urban “sailors” soon will take warning.
A “passage” time is upon us once again. Just as Labor Day mentally signals the beginning of fall, Memorial Day signals the beginning of summer. Just as the urge to nest and cocoon comes with the former, fueled by the first hints of foreboding northwest winds, the urge to step out and explore comes with the latter, energized by southwest breezes that, while at times carrying storms, carry the promise of sweeter air and rainbows, real and metaphorical.
The red skies have faded to a storm-hue purple. In the distance, there's a sense of a streaking fog that's actually the rapidly moving rain sheet. It arrives much as does a bucket of water being discarded. Makeshift ports — a bus stop here, an entryway there — harbor those caught by surprise (or at least feigning surprise to mask their umbrella forgetfulness).
But as quickly as they came, the showers are spent. There's no rainbow this morning. And the passing bus masks any sweetness that would have been a consolation.
— Colin McNickle
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Benchmarking questions: Fueling perversion
- U.N. Watch: Climate games
- Shenango shakedown: Public money at risk
- Sunday pops
- Saturday essay: The thumb itches
- Jesse White’s chutzpah
- The Obama foreign policy ‘model’ imperils the world.
- Piercing the media’s shield: Muzzles & slopes
- Obama & Wolf: Taxers and spenders
- Public pension ‘ka-boom’
- The Box