ShareThis Page

Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances

| Thursday, May 23, 2013, 8:55 p.m.

Laurel: To Leechburg voters. We were pleased to see the voters looked at political operative Chuck Pascal's attempt to run for three local offices and turned their noses up and their thumbs down. Pascal lost his run for mayor. And he also finished last on the ballot for school board and council. Unfortunately, he'll most likely be elected to both in the fall because there were only as many people running as there were open seats. Pascal will have to resign from one.

Laurel: To flag-fliers: With the Memorial Day weekend upon us, isn't it time to pull out Old Glory? It's the perfect way to show that you solemnly remember those who gave their last full measure in defense of the liberties we enjoy today. Find your Stars and Stripes today, make sure it's in good working order — neither soiled nor torn — and fly it high and proud.

An observation: The Westmoreland County Democratic Party's inexorable march toward irrelevance continues. These pathetic politicos had the best candidate for judge in Bill McCabe in Tuesday's primary facing two Republicans. But despite their “best efforts,” Dem Chairman Dante Bertani's gang couldn't get McCabe nominated to the Dem ballot in the fall. The incumbent Democrat row officers, Prothonotary Christina O'Brien, District Attorney John Peck and Coroner Ken Bacha, should start worrying about November.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.