The IRS & ObamaCare: Leviathan threatens
So the Internal Revenue Service is up to its pesky neck in reports of its own purely political harassment. And this befuddled agency is about to become the federal “enforcer” for ObamaCare?
It's time Congress calls a timeout.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act amounts to “the largest set of tax-law changes in 20 years,” according to the Treasury's inspector general. Whether people have health insurance or not, most will get taxed, along with most employers who provide health insurance.
In all, ObamaCare includes at least 18 tax increases, along with new levies on medical devices, insurers and pharmaceutical companies, according to The Heritage Foundation.
And working in concert with the IRS will be the federal Department of Health and Human Services, where chief despot Kathleen Sebelius three years ago reportedly threatened insurance companies for speaking badly of government health care. Now she's seeking contributions from health industry groups for Enroll America, which is working to supposedly “educate” the public, The Washington Post reports.
Will people who don't abide by ObamaCare's mandates face IRS audits? What of corporations that don't contribute to Ms. Sebelius' cause?
The implications are enormous. Before ObamaCare clamps down on America like a steel bear trap, a special prosecutor must be named to investigate what is clear, present and intolerable at the IRS.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Benchmarking questions: Fueling perversion
- U.N. Watch: Climate games
- Piercing the media’s shield: Muzzles & slopes
- Sunday pops
- Jesse White’s chutzpah
- The Box
- Shenango shakedown: Public money at risk
- Snow shovelers needed: A call for volunteers
- Saturday essay: The thumb itches
- Radar searches: Get a warrant