Dissing Israel: Kerry's blunder
Perpetuating a foreign-policy mistake that the Obama administration made at its outset and shows no inclination to correct, Secretary of State John Kerry has reaffirmed the regrettable view that Israel — not its enemies — presents the main stumbling block to solving the Palestinian problem and bringing peace to the Middle East.
In a stunning display of both misguided diplomacy and disregard for what The Washington Free Beacon described as “a largely Jewish audience,” Mr. Kerry, on June 3, told the American Jewish Committee's annual policy conference in Washington that by failing to reach peace with the Palestinians, Israel fuels terrorist extremism worldwide.
He backed that contention by citing world leaders bringing it up every time he meets with them. But that only proves those world leaders are as off-base as Kerry and President Obama are.
Theirs is a worldview that defies reality by blaming Israel, victim of constant attacks, for not making peace with its attackers. It ignores anti-Semitic Iran's use of its Hamas and Hezbollah proxies to ensure that any Israeli effort toward peace with the Palestinians goes nowhere.
And it leaves the Obama administration more concerned with Israel making concessions to its Palestinian tormentors than with denying Iran the nuclear means for Israel's destruction that it's bent on developing.
With that as the foreign policy of Israel's supposed best friend, America, Israelis can be forgiven for wondering if they need enemies.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Sunday pops
- The visa flap: A prevailing stench
- The Box
- Kittanning Council conundrum: Why disband authority?
- Mon-Yough Laurels & Lances
- The Connellsville WCVI building: Another fine mess
- Open contract negotiations: Let the sunshine in
- Saturday essay: Anatomy of a backache
- The student-loan balloon
- Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
- Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances