ShareThis Page

Greensburg Tuesday takes

| Monday, June 10, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Intriguing development: A planned North Huntingdon development of 251 single-family homes, one of the largest proposed housing projects in the township, signals an encouraging uptick in residential real estate. Also encouraging, at least in the preliminary presentation of “Tuscan Hills,” is that the developer of this former farmland says upfront that he would pay for a requisite traffic light. Too often with projects of this scale, developers don't make these offers. Some make demands — oftentimes unrealistic and usually at the public's cost.

Made in the shades?: Westmoreland County government insults taxpayers when it shells out for designer sunglasses, at $112 a pair, for some sheriff's deputies. For all the lame excuses for this peculiar perk, perhaps someone can explain why sunglasses are even part of an annual uniform “allowance” for deputies when Controller Jeff Balzer says “80 percent of their work is indoors”?

Busted: Amid reports of thieves ripping out copper piping from new and/or vacant homes, it's good to hear that at least one seasoned burglar will be made to pay. Jason Miller, 33, who pleaded guilty to more than a dozen thefts from Ligonier to New Alexandria last year, will serve at least 18 months in prison and was ordered to pay more than $350,000. For even the dumbest copper thieves — whose toil and trouble could be better dedicated to legal pursuits — this penalty should be a wake-up call.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.