Anonymous Connellsville donors: Money & more
Published: Friday, June 14, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
To the anonymous donor who recently presented a generous gift to the Connellsville Police Department, we join police officials in saying thank you.
This person, who helped the department reach its goal to upgrade onboard computers for police vehicles, did so without seeking any publicity or recognition. He asked only whether the police department met its goal. Then he wrote a check for $1,500.
That brought donations over the top. Police had already received $500 from the Connellsville Lions Club and $1,000 from the Yough River Trail Council.
To these two organizations, we also say thank you.
The onboard computers are important to the city police department's everyday operations. The terminals enable officers to check on vehicles and people so they don't need to bother 911. That keeps radio traffic down and can speed things up for officers.
Many acts of kindness go unrecognized in the city. And donors don't always give money. Some people instead donate their time and energy. And they don't ask for anything in return.
Obviously these community-minded individuals care about their city. That's demonstrated, and not always publicly, through their good works.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ObamaCare: HIT’s hit
- On regulatory ‘autopilot’: Anchors on the economy
- The Thursday wrap
- ‘China City’
- Detroit’s bankruptcy: An object lesson
- Anti-fracking scandal: More junk ‘science’
- Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
- Saturday essay: A special tinsel
- Christmas in Connellsville: Catch the spirit
- Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
- PSERS time bomb: Tick, tick, tick, tick ...