Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, June 13, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
Laurel: To the Penguins. The knee-jerk management reaction to the Pens being swept out of the Eastern Conference finals this year would have been to fire head coach Dan Bylsma. But the knees were kept in check, the jerk gene was suppressed and Mr. Bylsma has been given a two-year contract extension. Now about Bylsma's contention that Marc-Andre Fleury still is the Pens' No. 1 goaltender — can we talk, Dan?
Laurel: To the Girl Scouts of Western Pennsylvania. Yes, the venerable organization has cut the number of camps by nearly half, to nine. But it's in pursuit of financial prudence and better, long-term opportunities for the girls. And a lease it signed for the extraction of Marcellus shale natural gas from its Butler County camp soon will begin paying royalties. That was another prudent move. We wish the Girl Scouts lots of royalty checks and financial stability.
On the “Watch List”: The Port Authority board. Here's a novel concept to consider as Republicans and Democrats in Allegheny County and Harrisburg snipe over state legislation that would alter how board members are appointed: Treat the mass-transit agency as the independent authority it is meant to be. Of course, the power to grease palms and be greased (politically speaking, of course) likely is too tempting for that to ever happen.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.