Saturday essay: Garden of change
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, June 14, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
The greenhouse and raised beds are in transition yet again. But this iteration is a bit earlier than usual.
Lettuce was ample but short-lived this spring. It and the Chinese cabbage, which produced perhaps two-dozen broad leaves per plant but never started to form heads, bolted early. And that was that.
The cabbage is gone; perhaps a late summer planting will fare better. Heirloom tomatoes have replaced it in the beds. The eggplant and zucchini, each wildly flowering, will appreciate the extra space the cabbage vacated in the greenhouse.
And the last of the lettuce, romaine and bibb, soon will be exhausted, replaced by a combination of celery, sown en masse and harvested for its young shoots, 65-day short carrots and radishes — all of which will keep a dozen or so long and rectangular containers busy until fall lettuces are sown.
Back in the raised beds, the green beans and cucumbers, having survived the Memorial Day weekend freeze, only now are flowering. But that's still ahead of the game of many.
And the tomatoes — oh, those tomatoes, seven varieties this year — already have nearly 70 fruits, each the size of a small marble. That's on pace to easily exceed last year's total haul of more than 500 delectable orbs.
Of course, gardeners do dream bigger than emperors.
— Colin McNickle
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ‘Un-American’? That’s Harry Reid, the Senate’s lowly smear artist
- The market speaks: Cadillac dealers reject another electric folly
- Fixing Ford City’s water leaks: Time is money
- Saturday essay: The gardeners’ etiquette
- 2014 Greater Connellsville Chamber of Commerce Awards: In service to their community
- The Russian invasion: Sanctions, now
- Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes
- Market perversions: Chrysler retreats
- The new SAT: Rigor gets a pass