Share This Page

Sunday pops

| Saturday, June 15, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

The New York Post, citing “sources,” says new H.J. Heinz Co. owner 3G Capital “has already dispatched a team of cost-cutters to Heinz headquarters in Pittsburgh.” Supposedly first on the chopping block will be the ketchup and sauce maker's “fleet of Gulfstream IV and V jets.” A source says 3G “does not want to be seen as cutting costs — or jobs — while people at the top still live the high life.” Which sounds as if the stage is being set, doesn't it? ... Rep. Jeff Duncan, R-S.C., says he wants to know why IRS agents are training with semiautomatic AR-15 rifles. The chairman of the House Homeland Security oversight subcommittee says he saw the training firsthand at a federal firing range last month. The IRS defends such training. But asks Mr. Duncan, “Are Americans that much of a target that you need that kind of capability?” Look for a new run on AR-15s by their “targets.” ... A study conducted by the staff of Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., says advertising and outreach programs promoting food stamps increased six-fold between 2000 and 2011. Spending reached $41.3 million in 2011, the study concluded. Nearly 50 million Americans are on food stamps these days. Such surges in government dependence are what “progressives” consider to be a “success.” ... Officials at Joshua (Texas) High School turned off the microphone of valedictorian Remington Reimer when, in his commencement speech, he started talking about the Constitution, liberty and faith. The school must be run by former IRS employees.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.