Greensburg Laurels & Lances
Laurel: To a far more promising Monessen development. After fanciful musings about creating an art colony in the city — on the public's dime, naturally — Monessen now has the catalyst for meaningful economic development: ArcelorMittal and the city have come to terms on restarting a coke plant, which will employ about 180 workers. ArcelorMittal also announced it will pump $50 million into modernizing the facility. Real investment. Real jobs. Real development. These paint a more realistic picture for Monessen.
Lance: To the lame arm of the law. The outcome of the heroin case against former Westmoreland County deputy sheriff Erika Ditch, 24, doesn't pass the sniff test. Police caught Ms. Ditch and another woman with more than 70 stamp bags of heroin on April 3 in Pittsburgh; she was charged with possession with the intent to deliver — a felony. But a mere nine weeks later, the Allegheny County District Attorney's Office dropped the felony charges, and Ditch emerged from court with a year's probation. If she plays nice, her record will be expunged. Maybe then she can resume her deputy duties, eh?
On the “Watch List”: Derry Borough's water works. Whether discussions with the Municipal Authority of Westmoreland County on future operations were purely informational, as council President Kristine Melville says, or something more clandestine, as one council member suggests, the apparent disconnection leaves residents wondering if one hand of Derry government knows what the other is doing. And that weakens the public's confidence in those elected to lead.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.