Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
Smart choice: Allegheny County officials continue to explore the possibility of drilling shale gas reserves in its county parks. And it appears to be a no-brainer, based on estimates of what those reserves are and how much could be garnered in royalties. It would be a great way to bolster county coffers and services while easing the burden on taxpayers.
Dumb words: Pittsburgh Mayor Luke Ravenstahl chastised the media last week for speculating that the federal investigation into his administration is somehow linked to his public appearances, which have been few and far between since he decided, suddenly, to not seek re-election. “You all think my job is talking to you,” he told reporters. No, it's being a public leader, Mr. Mayor.
Encouraging decision: One of the best indicators of future economic prosperity is watching the expansion plans of business and industry. Thus, it's encouraging news that Dick's Sporting Goods has decided to lease 73 acres near Pittsburgh International Airport to expand its corporate headquarters in Findlay. Yes, the economy continues to have its problems. But anytime any business expands, so, too, soon will the economy.
Rabies alert: Eighteen foxes have tested positive for rabies this year in Pennsylvania. The latest was last week in Armstrong County. A fox attacked a 7-year-old boy. After it bit the child, it latched on and ended up in the family's house, which incurred considerable damage. Rule No. 1: Stay clear of wild animals.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.