Saturday essay: First light
The first lightning bug of the season flits by in the gathering dusk of spring's penultimate day, its telltale abdominal light flashing a golden code unique to each beetle.
It's soon apparent that this bug is — SHOCK! — not alone; a number of other lights begin to flash in the foliage below. A few females are responding. “It” is a he and the “she's” are interested. And away they go.
For a child growing up in rural Ohio, lightning bugs were no such entomological exercise in the birds and bees but a marker:
There was no “sleeping out” — on the back porch, in jammies, atop old bed frames outfitted with skids and sleeping bags — until the first lightning bugs of summer appeared (a supposedly sure sign that we wouldn't freeze in the process).
And that, oftentimes, coincided with Independence Day and delivery of our annual brand-new guns — cap guns, that is.
In the fading light after the family cookout, the snaps of the caps were challenged by the shouts of “Got another one!” as boys collected lightning bugs in empty pop bottles to make living lanterns for the long and scary night ahead.
The first light of morning usually brought two realizations — that July dew is no warmer than June's and that lightning bugs don't keep very well in pop bottles.
— Colin McNickle
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Benchmarking questions: Fueling perversion
- U.N. Watch: Climate games
- Jesse White’s chutzpah
- Shenango shakedown: Public money at risk
- Those new methane rules: More eco-extremism
- Saturday essay: The thumb itches
- Sunday pops
- The Penn State deal: Focus lost
- The Obama foreign policy ‘model’ imperils the world.
- Piercing the media’s shield: Muzzles & slopes