TribLIVE

| Opinion/The Review

 
Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Another Veterans Administration outrage: Sheer arrogance

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or cmcnickle@tribweb.com).

Daily Photo Galleries

Thursday, June 20, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
 

Two high-ranking officials of the Department of Veterans Affairs say they support recently introduced legislation requiring hospitals to disclose Legionnaires' and other infectious diseases to state and local officials. But they want to be exempt from paying fines for failing to do so and, oh, yes, they want the mandate to be “voluntary.”

Robert L. Jesse, the VA's deputy undersecretary for health, told a House Veterans Affairs subcommittee on Wednesday that the agency “is committed” to better reporting. Jane Clare Joyner, the VA's assistant general counsel, says fines would be better spent on patient care.

Well, isn't that special. The same VA that appears to have worked overtime to escape accountability — and, dare we say it, gone to great lengths to hide years and years of repeated Legionella bacterial outbreaks at its Pittsburgh-area hospitals that killed people and sickened others — now wants a special dispensation.

Talk about arrogance.

Congress should not budge one fraction of an inch in demanding rigorous infectious disease reporting to all levels of government. And VA officials, especially those overseeing Pittsburgh operations, should feign no surprise should the Justice Department bring criminal charges for such reprehensibly lax, if not reckless, conduct.

Supporters of the reporting requirement call the fines a “compliance motivator.” Given the VA's consistent behavior, we can think of no better “compliance motivator” than an indictment and the threat of prison time.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.

 

 


Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. Saturday essay: Seeding next year
  2. Reforming immigration: Raise the bar
  3. More than just mums in Connellsville
  4. Fresh produce solution
  5. The Kane case: Distractions mount
  6. The Iranian deal: Mortal blessings
  7. Trumpeting ObamaCare: The Medicaid factor
  8. Tuesday takes
  9. U.N. Watch: More propaganda
  10. Wilmerding’s gamble
  11. Greensburg Tuesday takes