The Hill newspaper reports that, in the aftermath of the Supreme Court's same-sex marriage rulings, House conservatives will seek to reintroduce a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage. But revival of what's known as the Federal Marriage Amendment is said to be dead on arrival. And that's good news. For the last thing this country needs is an attempt to enshrine in the Constitution a contemporary act of overt discrimination. ... A Rasmussen Reports poll finds that among those who approve of President Obama's job performance, 26 percent say those associated with the tea party movement are a terrorist threat. That's right behind radical Muslims, who polled at 29 percent. Which gives you an idea why so many Obama supporters consider America's Founding principles a threat to their evolving European socialist way of life. ... The private, nonprofit National Bureau of Economic Research suggests that adding a 10 percent tax on calories could lower the percentage of youth body fat by up to 9 percent. The study's authors call it “the most direct way of taxing obesity.” And we'll bet a 10 percent tax on silly studies that suggest regressively taxing the poorest among us, supposedly “for their own good,” could lower the percentage of silly studies by 100 percent. ... America celebrates its 237th birthday on Thursday. Take some time to actually read the Declaration of Independence. It will remind you, we hope, of your duty, as Thomas Jefferson wrote, to throw off despotic government and to provide new guards for liberty's future security.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- An ObamaCare ‘re-do’?
- The Moody’s downgrade: Inaction’s price
- The flood of illegals: Misplaced blame
- Same old Cuba
- Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes
- Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
- The EPA: Another power grab
- Sunday pops
- The Box
- The federal budget: Here we go again
- Greensburg Tuesday takes