Share This Page

Greensburg Tuesday takes

| Monday, June 24, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Jeannette's crackdown?: City officials say they're getting tough with Jeannette's absentee landlords by, in part, increasing the number of building inspections. Meanwhile folks who enter the city via Route 30 westbound can't help but notice the towering testament to the city's “enforcement”: the dilapidated Monsour Medical Center, which, like a cancerous tumor, has metastasized during seven years of neglect. So much for uniformity in enforcement.

Pantry's paperwork: It's hard to imagine how, for three years, the Monessen Food Pantry reportedly failed to file tax forms, ultimately resulting in the Internal Revenue Service yanking its nonprofit status. Monessen Mayor Mary Jo Smith, listed as the pantry's chairman and CEO on its last filing, is mum on any mess-up. Fortunately for the more than 500 families served by this, the area's largest community pantry, the Westmoreland County Food Bank has stepped in and picked up this dropped ball.

Relief after 10 years?: Pardon us if we reserve the horn-blowing on news that for the first time in 10 years, the Franklin Regional School Board approved a budget without a tax increase. For this, taxpayers should be grateful when at least one board member says that in terms of cuts, nothing's changed? Which applies as well to Harrisburg, where the teachers pension time bomb ticks away with not much regard for taxpayers.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.