| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

The Supreme Court & voting rights: A sound decision

About The Tribune-Review
The Tribune-Review can be reached via e-mail or at 412-321-6460.
Contact Us | Video | Photo Reprints

Daily Photo Galleries

By The Tribune-Review

Published: Tuesday, June 25, 2013, 1:57 p.m.

It was a classic no-brainer for the U.S. Supreme Court.

In a 5-4 ruling Tuesday, the high court found Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act to be unconstitutional. The section — designed to eradicate voter discrimination by requiring nine states and parts of six others to seek federal approval in all matters electoral and renewed by Congress multiple times — relies on decades-old data that do not reflect reality, the court held.

“Nearly 50 years later, things have changed dramatically,” said Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority. Such as registration and turnout rates in the affected jurisdictions now approaching parity. Such as minority candidates holding office at unprecedented levels. Such as actual voting discrimination being rare, he said.

“(H)istory did not end in 1965. ... (H)istory since 1965 cannot be ignored,” Mr. Justice Roberts wrote.

But the usual suspects are apoplectic over the ruling. Among them, the leftist Alliance for Justice. “(A) five-justice majority ... has effectively removed the keystone from the arch of protection for people of color,” wailed group president Nan Aron.

It does nothing of the sort. It invalidated a legal antiquity that Congress repeatedly rubber-stamped for political expediency (while making the rules even more onerous) and opens the door wide for Congress to authorize a new section that relies on the facts on the ground — contemporary data.

After all, as Roberts also wrote, “The (15th) Amendment is not designed to punish for the past; it's purpose is to ensure a better future.”



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. The case of Beaver County Sheriff George David: He should be jailed pending trial
  2. The Thursday wrap
  3. Another IPCC warning: More sci-fi
  4. The Nevada standoff
  5. The Obama/Biden visit: Oh, the irony
  6. Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
  7. The Thursday wrap
  8. Vladimir the corrupt: Up the sanctions against Putin
  9. Paying the ObamaCare premium
  10. The problem with BNY Mellon: It wears blinders
  11. Greensburg Tuesday takes
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.