Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, July 4, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
Laurel: To David McCullough. Pittsburgh's favorite historian returns to his native city on Sunday, his 80th birthday, for a very special honor. The 16th Street Bridge will be renamed for him. It begins a daylong celebration of the legendary scribe who brought the building of the Brooklyn Bridge alive — and who brought so many historical figures alive for generations of Americans. Welcome back, Mr. McCullough. Enjoy your day.
On the “Watch List”:
• Shell. The petro giant has received a second six-month extension on the option it holds on 300 acres along the Ohio River in Beaver County. And that presents a wonderful opportunity for state and local leaders to reconsider the billion-dollar-plus in tax incentives they've thrown at Shell to locate the “cracker” plant there. As we've asked before, if this thing is the supposed be-all and end-all, why are taxpayers being turned into venture capitalists?
• The Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra. Its finances once again are a mess. Its deficit tripled in the last fiscal year, to nearly $3 million. And that's threatening $17 million in grants, money that can be accessed only by the PSO proving its financial health. A fluctuating investments portfolio and pension obligations are said to have strapped the orchestra. Perhaps soliciting pennies for the pipers from schoolchildren, as we did several years ago, wasn't such a dumb idea.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Junk nutrition
- The secret ballot: Protect it
- Lever A-1: Pot-infused brownies
- Sunday pops
- Liquor privatization: Now’s the time
- THE BOX
- Another IPCC warning: More sci-fi
- Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
- Keystone caper: Pipeline politics
- The big sting: To what end?