Share This Page

Sunday pops

| Saturday, July 6, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Banks are loosening mortgage standards in a drive for higher profits. There are “two-mortgage” deals to reduce down payments and loan approvals for those with lower credit scores and higher debt/asset ratios. Isn't this what started The Great Recession? ... For a teaser headline for an Investor's Business Daily editorial, Lucianne.com came up with this gem: “IRS rules Obama can write off his second term so far as a total loss.” That about sums it up, doesn't it? ... A new Harvard study suggests that lawmakers “are more likely to vote for global warming legislation after freak storms hit their home states or districts,” reports The Washington Times. Looks as if the climate cluckers' propaganda campaign is working. ... It took a Freedom of Information Act filing by Judicial Watch to get the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to cough up the fact that it has spent millions of dollars to collect and analyze, without any warrants, Americans' financial transactions and even to share that information with “additional government entities.” There's nothing this government doesn't know about us. ... We were thinking of recommending a return to carrier pigeons to conduct our most private dealings. But then we figured they, too, would be monitored — by drones disguised as pigeons.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.