Greensburg Tuesday takes
Out-of-whack expenses: On the long road to balancing its 2013-14 budget, the Hempfield Area School Board closed Bovard Elementary School and used $2.5 million from its capital reserve. And still that wasn't enough: Taxpayers were hit with a 1.5-mill tax hike, stemming in part from increases in employees' health care and pension costs — the latter courtesy of the state's lackadaisical lawmakers who have yet to fix an antiquated, defined-benefit pension system. Until Harrisburg gets off the dime, taxpayers can expect to endure a lot more pocket-diving just to cover school employees' retirements.
Latrobe's next step: Facing a $500,000 projected debt by 2016, Latrobe officials are moving ahead with a five-year management plan that affects every city department. In line with this, are there not cooperative ventures with neighboring Unity that could assist the city's bottom line? For example: a shared police department. Nothing ventured, nothing saved.
Another hard-learned lesson: The sting of $27,711 in thefts from the Derry Area Football Boosters Club directly affects the good work of this organization and the team members it supports. Charged with theft is former club president Lori M. Nicely. And if that's not bad enough, the treasurer of the cheerleaders boosters around the same time allegedly pocketed nearly $12,000. Chalk up two more lessons in why checks and balances are a must for any organization, large or small, that collects money.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.