Fighting summertime crime: What Connellsville residents can do
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, July 5, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
Police in Connellsville and other locales have been busy in recent weeks.
Recently, city residents awoke to slashed tires. More than 60 vehicles throughout Connellsville were damaged. Police quickly apprehended six suspects.
Reports of burglaries and robberies also have kept our local police busy.
It seems summer is a season for more crime, petty thefts, vandalism, camp burglaries, excessive noise and fighting. And sometimes citizens don't approach their municipal leaders with their concerns.
If that's a sign of public satisfaction, fine. But if it's a sign of apathy — or citizens' fear to report crime — then that's a serious matter.
Some communities have citizen watch programs, and these can be beneficial. In Connellsville, a group of concerned residents is working with city police to start a neighborhood watch. We encourage residents to attend a planning session, scheduled 5:30 p.m. Wednesday at city hall.
Being on the lookout for criminal behavior is not paranoia. And reporting criminals to police is not snitching. It is being good citizens — part of government “by the people” that we purport to cherish.
Simply calling the police and not getting the desired outcome is not a sign of inefficiency. On the other hand, we occasionally ignore festering crime-related issues until they become major problems.
If you have concerns, talk to local police and municipal leaders. And attend next week's crime watch meeting and lend your support.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ‘Un-American’? That’s Harry Reid, the Senate’s lowly smear artist
- The market speaks: Cadillac dealers reject another electric folly
- Market perversions: Chrysler retreats
- Sunday pops
- The new SAT: Rigor gets a pass
- The IRS scandal: Compelling Lerner
- THE BOX