Greensburg Laurels & Lances
Lance: To Fayette County Prison correction officers' call-offs. Warden Brian Miller presents a sickening account of absenteeism, which contributed to more than $13,000 in overtime costs last month. On average, two officers call off daily. If it's a weekend, “double it.” On holidays, “triple it,” he says. Yet given this abysmal record, union president Mike Hicks takes issue with Fayette for hiring part-timers instead of full-timers to pick up the slack. Talk about union logic.
Laurel: To a hero's distinction. Recognized as a Carnegie Hero, the late Stacey Feiling of Mt. Pleasant also has been honored with a plaque at the Arnold Palmer Cancer Pavilion, where she worked. Three years ago, Ms. Feiling, 42, was shot and killed trying to help a woman who had been shot by her husband. May her example of bravery inspire cancer patients to persevere.
Laurel: To Delmont police. The department's summertime foot patrols through neighborhoods aren't new, but they should provide food for thought for police in other locales as a way to get closer to the people they serve. That's going the extra mile, or miles, to police a community.
An observation: Three people who police say used a stolen credit card in a gas-for-cash scheme wouldn't have gotten very far if the card's owner had promptly reported it missing. Instead, the thieves reportedly used the Sunoco Fleet credit card for a full year, racking up more than $55,000 in gas purchases. This is a case of common crime perpetuated by a stunning absence of common sense.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.