Saturday essay: Fridge follies
The refrigerator purchased the proverbial “just a few years ago” actually is pushing 15 years old. And it has seen better days.
The ice maker quit working, conveniently, a few weeks after the manufacturer's warranty expired. Surely the retailer trips a switch that starts a timer to disable it in week 55 — if you don't buy the extended warranty for the modest sum of half the fridge's price.
The “sturdy” door shelves “that can store gallon jugs of milk and juice quite easily and most securely” cracked quite easily and soon. Replacements seemed to cost more than a compact car. No glue in the universe could fix them. But duct tape did. And, oh, how pretty.
The same high-quality plastic (ahem) was used on the rails of the crisper and meat drawers. Each set of rails, now broken, leave the drawers sitting askew.
All things considered, including a failing grade for utility and a C for cooling, this fridge is kaput. A new fancy-schmancy model arrives today. Stainless steel. French doors. Onboard computer. OnStar (kidding). And, you can bet, new and improved high-quality interior plastic. (Ahem.)
The salesman pushed an “extended” warranty (for about the same price as a half-ounce of gold), one which oddly goes into effect immediately, not even waiting for the manufacturer's one-year warranty to expire.
Which suggests a modest investment in duct tape futures would be wise.
— Colin McNickle
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Benchmarking questions: Fueling perversion
- U.N. Watch: Climate games
- Piercing the media’s shield: Muzzles & slopes
- Jesse White’s chutzpah
- Sunday pops
- Shenango shakedown: Public money at risk
- The Box
- Snow shovelers needed: A call for volunteers
- Saturday essay: The thumb itches
- Radar searches: Get a warrant