Share This Page

Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances

| Thursday, July 11, 2013, 8:55 p.m.

On the “Watch List”:

• The “investigation” into the Apollo fireworks accident. We learned something new this week: If there's an accident in a small Pennsylvania town during a fireworks display causing injuries, nobody investigates it. The state police don't, neither does any federal agency and Apollo has no one qualified. The borough is relying on Pyrotecnico, the company that put on the display, to tell it what happened. And Pyrotechnico has already said its “investigators” believe the company isn't responsible. Gee, no shock there.

• Deer ticks: By all means, watch out for ticks. It appears Western Pennsylvania is on pace to set a new record for cases of Lyme disease, which is acquired from being bitten by the tiny bugs. Use insect repellent containing DEET outdoors and avoid areas with high grass and leaf litter.

Laurel: To staying put. The Leechburg Area School District has decided to remain in the WPIAL. We've always thought the plan to move to PIAA District 6 was motivated by the football team being unable to compete with WPIAL Class A teams. What kind of lesson is it to teach kids, “If you can't win, play lesser teams.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.