Share This Page

The Thursday wrap

| Wednesday, July 17, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Entertainer Stevie Wonder says he will not perform in Florida until its Stand Your Ground law is “abolished,” reports The Hollywood Reporter. It's in response to the acquittal of George Zimmerman. And Mr. Wonder says he'll not perform in any state with such a law. Anybody care to wager who comes out ahead in this boycott? ... Democrat gubernatorial candidate John Hanger is calling for the phased-in legalization of marijuana by 2017. He says Pennsylvania spends $325 million annually processing marijuana arrests. Yes, that's nuts. “Regulating and taxing marijuana could bring in at least $24 million a year to state coffers,” Mr. Hanger adds. That's smart. ... The Washington Times reports that the Treasury Department has admitted that confidential records of several political candidates and campaign donors were “improperly scrutinized by government officials, but the Justice Department had declined to prosecute any of the cases.” We've lost count on how many scandals are plaguing the Obama administration. But its fundamental lawlessness grows more stunning by the week. ... Consultant Chuck Thies bemoans that while Washington, D.C., Council has mandated that Wal-Mart and other large retailers doing business there pay a minimum hourly wage of $12.50, D.C. government pays up to $2.10 less. His solution? Mandate an increase in the minimum wage for all. Brilliant! Call it the Chuck Thies Unemployment Act of 2013.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.