Share This Page

Sunday pops

| Saturday, July 20, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Cuba has been caught red-handed attempting to smuggle Russian-made missile radar systems to North Korea. By all means, let's “normalize” U.S. relations with the Cubans, right? ... Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., has introduced legislation that would make all U.S. contributions to the United Nations voluntary, cap the amount and create new oversight to monitor how Turtle Bay is frittering away your tax dollars. It's a great proposal, just 68 years overdue. ... Two days after George Zimmerman's acquittal, an Associated Press dispatch referred to Mr. Zimmerman, a Hispanic, as “white.” The reference later was changed to “Zimmerman identifies himself as Hispanic.” That, from an organization that identifies itself as a wire service. ... The Daily Caller says the town of Deer Trail, Colo., population 546, is considering an ordinance authorizing “licensed bounty hunters” to shoot down government drones that violate its “sovereign airspace.” Twenty-five dollars will be paid for wings and fuselages. But for “mostly intact” drones, $100 will be paid. All wreckage, however, must bear “markings ... consistent with those used by the United States federal government.” Oh, and if the bounty hunters mistake a hobbyist's radio-controlled model airplane for a drone, they have to reimburse the owner. We'll give the folks in Deer Trail a grade of G — for gumption. But we have a funny feeling they'll be hearing from a few (if not many) G-men should the ordinance pass.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.