Iran's Latin threat: It's real and increasing
A newly reported secret meeting of a senior Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps officer with Venezuelan military and security chiefs shows how wrong the State Department is when it downplays Iran's nefarious Latin American activities.
ProPublica reports the secret meeting occurred during Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's January 2012 visit with Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. Western intelligence officials say the Venezuelans agreed to help Iran with arms, ID documents, bank accounts and movement of operatives and equipment.
The late Mr. Chavez's successor, President Nicolas Maduro, was “a point man for the alliance with Iran” as foreign minister from 2006-12. Mr. Ahmadinejad's successor, Iranian President-elect Hassan Rowhani, long has been among Tehran's ruling radicals.
So, changing faces won't change the growing Iranian threat in America's southern backyard.
Yet State's latest assessment says Iran's Latin American influence “is waning” — despite Iran's intensifying regional activity and evidence of its involvement in a foiled 2007 plot against New York's JFK Airport and deadly 1990s bombings of Jewish and Israeli targets in Argentina, and of Venezuelan aid to Iranian terrorist proxy Hezbollah, which U.S. investigators say is funding itself through cocaine trafficking.
The Iranian threat in Latin America is real and increasing. Denying that grim reality only compounds the danger it poses to the U.S.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Obama’s problem: He denies reality
- Saturday essay: Cruel civilities
- Armstrong County Laurels & Lances
- Messrs. Tremba, Haggerty & Molinaro: Connellsville mourns
- Auberle continues to heal
- Not even a ‘trickle’ of sound economics
- At the Supreme Court: No fishing
- The Thursday wrap
- Greensburg Laurels & Lances