Share This Page

Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances

| Thursday, July 18, 2013, 8:55 p.m.

Laurel: To New Kensington officials. Common sense said the hasty plan to barricade Virginia Drive was terrible idea. The city commissioned a traffic study and probably will start to control traffic with a speed hump. My, how sensible. Now we hope city officials can concentrate on making the intersection of Carl Avenue and Tarentum Bridge Road safer. Many more people are impacted by that intersection, where two people were killed last August.

On the “Watch List”: West Deer's land banking effort. There's nothing wrong with attempting to save and rehabilitate abandoned, dilapidated houses. But for a house in Curtisville with a bad foundation, mold, dead animals, etc., that wasn't realistic. Even if the house had been fully rehabilitated — an expensive and dubious plan — its value would still have been $50,000 or less. The township commissioners voted Wednesday to demolish that house and four others. Good.

Laurel: To the Pirates. The Battlin' Bucs open the second half of the season in Cincinnati tonight as the No. 2 team in all of Major League Baseball, second only to National League Central division mate St. Louis. The series opens a critical phase in the Pirates' climb to not only their first winning season in 21 years but a run at the playoffs. It's not quite time for pennant fever. But neither has Pirates Colony Collapse set in. Perhaps “there's always next year” really is this year. Let's go, Bucs!

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.