Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, July 25, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
Lance: To Brackenridge officials. The tiny borough is perpetually on “Short Street,” but this one takes the proverbial cake. Council purchased police-report software its computers can't use because its computers use the Windows XP operating system. Really? XP is 12 years old. That's Windows 8's great-grandfather. The borough is going to have to break down and spend like a whole $500 on a new computer.
Lance: To Heights Plaza owner Wild Blue Management. The New Jersey-based absentee landlord isn't talking — even to its tenants — about work to restore the plaza after last December's fire. Some work was done but the project has been stagnant for weeks now. Meanwhile, businesses are jumping ship to new locations, including former anchor Dunham's.
Laurel: To Arnold and its redevelopment authority. They tore down dilapidated buildings and cleared the lots. Now, they're selling them to neighbors. True, the parcels are going for a mere $500 but the point here is they're going back on the tax rolls and are owned by people who will use and maintain them. Less blight + more tax revenue = win.
R.I.P.: Ryan Richards. The Highlands High School football and baseball player and all-around good kid died doing something seemingly innocuous — riding in the back of a pickup truck. But riding in the bed is illegal because it's not hard to fall. What a terrible and tragic lesson.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Liquor privatization: Now’s the time
- Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
- Greensburg Laurels & Lances
- Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
- The case of Beaver County Sheriff George David: He should be jailed pending trial
- The Thursday wrap
- Another IPCC warning: More sci-fi
- Saturday essay: Deck of dreams
- Sunday pops
- Extend jobless benefits? It’s counterproductive
- The Nevada standoff