Share This Page

Pittsburgh Tuesday takes

| Monday, July 22, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Where's Luke?: Oh where, oh where could Pittsburgh's mayor be, oh where, oh where could he be? Lame-duck Mayor Luke Ravenstahl gave not one quack about his city hosting the 42nd annual conference of the Pennsylvania Mayors' Association over the weekend. He didn't attend. And nobody will say why he didn't. One would think if you're the host city for such a gathering, you'd be a gracious host and not a no-show with no explanation.

Burned again: It's becoming increasingly apparent that the US Airways heavily taxpayer-subsidized flight operations center in Moon will close when the airline's merger with American Airlines is finalized. And that has a lot of folks once again crying “Foul!” But it's par for the course for an airline that also “de-hubbed” Pittsburgh International Airport, a facility built specifically for it by Allegheny County. Perhaps the next shafting will finally force government to think thrice about such deals.

A class(ic) act: A quarter-of-a-million people attended the Pittsburgh Vintage Grand Prix this past weekend. And while it's a nationally recognized event for racing enthusiasts who get to enjoy some of the classiest of classic race cars, it's just as well known and laudable for the money it raises for the Autism Society of Pittsburgh. About $250,000 was raised this year. More than $3 million has been raised since 1983. Congratulations to all involved.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.