Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, July 25, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
Laurel: To increased river shipping. One way to judge a region's economic health is by measuring its shipping volume. And the Port of Pittsburgh Commission has some encouraging news: Shipping on the Allegheny, Monongahela and Ohio rivers increased by 62 percent this May over May 2012. It's the highest May total since 2008, just before the Great Recession. It's the latest in a long line of sound arguments for rehabilitating the region's long-in-the-tooth locks and dams.
On the “Watch List”:
• The Pittsburgh Panthers. It could be a looong fall for Pitt's football team. The sports media are predicting that the Panthers will finish in fifth place in their first year in the Coastal Division of the Atlantic Coast Conference. That's out of seven teams. Ouch. Miami tops the divisional balloting, followed by Virginia Tech, North Carolina and Georgia Tech. Clemson, from the Atlantic Division, was picked to win the ACC title. Hope the Pitt band is good this year. Double ouch.
• The Pittsburgh Steelers. The Black and Gold report to training camp today at St. Vincent College near Latrobe. They'll be looking to improve on last year's disappointing 8-8 record and make the venerable NFL franchise's 81st season more memorable. Think playoffs. Alan Robinson, the Trib's veteran sports scribe, is calling it “Camp Uncertainty” for the number of marquee players that must be replaced. Here we go. (Note how we're holding off on the exclamation point. At least for now.)
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
- The Adegbile nomination: Rejecting race-baiting
- Greensburg Laurels & Lances
- Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
- The Thursday wrap
- Common Core: Garbage in, garbage out
- Another EPA crock: Sulfur silliness
- Saturday essay: Coyote showdown?
- Rein in the IRS by de-clubbing the thugs