Saturday essay: The winds
The winds that rose that carried the rains that chased the tropics and heralded the fall have departed. But they brought so much more.
They carried the blasts of the horn of the freight train crossing the trestle in the miles-away valley through the bedroom window and into a mind stirred to journeys past and tracks yet traversed.
They delivered the symphony of the waterfall from the pond two yards below, its steady rhythms, a soothing reminder of youth, punctuated by the syncopated croaks of the bullfrog at rocks' edge.
The winds, too, brought the sounds of the crying baby one yard below, comforted by his mother mimicking, softly, the coos of the mourning dove. And of the still-suckling fawn — crying for its mother, her arrival and both settling in the tall grasses next door.
They also delivered from a kitchen unknown the visuals generated by the smells of some neighbor's late dinner — onions and garlic, peeled, chopped and sauteed, setting the olfactory stage for the delectable entree of, why, yes, of course, sirloin tips. The confirmation quickly was delivered by those same winds.
Yes, through suburban hills and dales — through trees and buildings, over grass and asphalt — the winds that rose that carried the rains that chased the tropics and heralded the fall, in a word, delivered. They will return in due time and deliver more wisps of not only what is but also of what once was and of what is to be.
— Colin McNickle
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ‘Canary in a coal mine’: The SSDI dilemma
- Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
- Greensburg Tuesday takes
- Mon-Yough Tuesday takes
- Mon-Yough Laurels & Lances
- Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes
- A school choice victory: Follow the child
- Greensburg Laurels & Lances
- The IRS scandal: A cover-up grows
- Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
- Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances