Published: Saturday, July 27, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
At least 14 staffers of the Pennsylvania State Education Association were paid at least $200,000 in salary and benefits in 2011, reports Jim Panyard, writing at mediatrackers.org. Seven of them had total compensation of a quarter-million dollars. Average teacher pay in Pennsylvania is just under $61,000. Average household income in the commonwealth is just under $52,000. Remember these figures the next time these union bosses talk about “economic fairness.” ... The federal government's “renewable fuel standards” are expected to raise the cost of diesel by 300 percent by 2015 and raise the cost of gasoline by 30 percent, according to one study. Couple this with attempts in Pennsylvania to raise the wholesale tax on motor fuels (which, of course, will be passed on to consumers) and the cost of everything transported by motor vehicles will skyrocket. And everything is transported by motor vehicles. More “progressive” economics. ... University of Michigan economics professor Mark J. Perry, writing for the American Enterprise Institute, says the share of middle-class families dropped from 61.8 percent in 1969 to 43.2 percent in 2009, a drop of 18.6 percentage points. And the share of lower-income families fell from 22 percent of all families in 1967 to 17.8 percent in 2009. So, where did they go? Mr. Perry says they joined the upper-income club, which increased from 16.2 percent of all families in 1967 to 39.1 percent in 2009. Thus, the contention that the middle class “has been in decline since the 1970s ... is incredibly and verifiably wrong,” he says. It's another stat for the “economic fairness” crowd.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ObamaCare: HIT’s hit
- On regulatory ‘autopilot’: Anchors on the economy
- ‘China City’
- The Thursday wrap
- Saturday essay: A special tinsel
- Christmas in Connellsville: Catch the spirit
- PSERS time bomb: Tick, tick, tick, tick ...
- Detroit’s bankruptcy: An object lesson