Rewarding initiative and overcoming employment barriers by teaching both work skills and life skills, Goodwill of Southwestern Pennsylvania's Reentry through Industry Specific Education Project, or RISE, is a program that a nation increasingly dependent on government needs.
With 14 of its first 18 graduates employed, RISE now is recruiting its second class of students from targeted neighborhoods who have physical or mental disabilities, criminal records, low-income or low-education backgrounds or lack computer know-how. They'll receive eight to 10 weeks of free, Home Builders Institute-certified training at Goodwill's facility on Pittsburgh's South Side.
Classes in carpentry, electrical work, plumbing, brick masonry, landscaping, facilities management, painting, “green” building and weatherization take a 70-percent “hands on” approach. Equally important are lessons in resume writing and dress and deportment for job interviews and the workplace.
A Pennsylvania CareerLink site administrator is involved. But Project RISE is an example of a nongovernmental agency — nonprofit Goodwill — taking the lead to help disadvantaged potential workers secure a career-ladder foothold toward self-sufficiency instead of relying on taxpayer-funded entitlements.
Hopefully, Project RISE will be able to assist all eligible students who want to pursue their own American dreams, maximizing its benefits for not just its graduates, their employers and communities but for society as a whole.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- The Thursday wrap
- James Foley, 1973-2014: Fighting on
- Tuesday essay: Sophie
- Another carbon credit scheme