The Democrats: Failure & pain
A debate supposedly is raging within the Democratic Party over whether to move from the “center-left” to the “left.”
As if the Democrats' political positioning ever was in doubt.
“The sooner we get back to a good, progressive, populist message, the better off we're going to be as Democrats,” Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, told The New York Times.
But worse off as Americans.
Think of President Obama's economics address of Wednesday — pure drivel at times punctuated with sheer buffoonery.
Among other things regurgitated in a speech designed to deflect attention away from the administration's hardly “phony” scandals, Mr. Obama, in the name of avoiding another housing bubble — like the one that burst and heralded the Great Recession — looks to blow another bubble, inflated with more “standards” chicanery. Never mind that the 1.2 million folks bailed out in the last go-round are re-defaulting at a rate of 46 percent.
Then there's Obama's renewed push for a higher minimum wage. The rungs on the economic ladder are being pushed further and further apart by income disparity; Americans can't climb into the middle class, the president said. Never mind that government-set wage floors remove the ladder's lowest rungs and reduce employment opportunities.
Democrats want to move even further to the left in the name of “progressivism” and “economic fairness.” But past being prologue, what they'll deliver will be more failure and more pain.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.