Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
Under the knife: Last week brought layoffs of 262 workers and elimination of 200 vacant jobs by Highmark — at the five hospitals it acquired in April to form its Allegheny Health Network (AHN) and at the corporate level. Also laid off were Allegheny Valley Hospital's CEO and two Forbes Regional Hospital administrators. AHN calls all this job-cutting “an essential step in our efforts to right-size the organization” toward restoring its financial health. Whether these layoffs truly are that or a major red flag for AHN's future remains to be seen.
Downhill champ: Congratulations to Elliott's Macaila Ziolkowski, 13. On Saturday, she became the first winner of the annual Greater Pittsburgh Soapbox Derby held in McKeesport to win in the national All-American Derby held in Akron, Ohio. Her stock-division triumph is welcome proof that not all youngsters today are too preoccupied with video games and social media to excel at less high-tech pursuits.
Pennant pivot?: The four-day, five-game series that the Pittsburgh Pirates began at home on Monday against the St. Louis Cardinals might not determine this season's outcome — once it ends, the teams still have nine more games against each other — but its implications are clear. With the Bucs and Cards dueling for best National League record, this series — to many, the biggest in PNC Park's history — could be a turning point, setting the tone and direction for the stretch drive. And Wednesday's trade deadline only thickens the plot. Let's go Bucs!
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.