Obama's budget buncombe: Same ol' tune
Barack Obama needs a diversion — anything to get the nation's attention off the growing list of his administration's scandals and policy failures. So, he's launched a pre-emptive attack against budget cuts, and his administration's acolytes are dropping the dreaded “S”-word, as in government shutdown.
How pathetically predictable.
“At a time when we need to make investments to create jobs and strengthen the middle class and grow our economy, I've got some of the House Republicans who put forward a budget that does just the opposite,” Mr. Obama said in Jacksonville, Fla.
Except Obama's “investments,” starting with his infamous stimulus, have led to one of the slowest U.S. recoveries in history. And while he insists on more spending, the Bipartisan Policy Center estimates that the Treasury will run out of cash sometime between mid-October and mid-November, The Wall Street Journal reports.
Even if Congress avoids a government shutdown on Oct. 1, it will confront a bigger battle over raising the debt ceiling.
So naturally Obama will harp on nasty Republicans cutting services to seniors and children. But this time around, his political stock is in steep decline, with a failed pitch for gun control, an immigration deal idled in the House, a foreign policy in shambles and proposed environmental diktats on the ropes.
Rather than take the bait, Republicans must expose the baiter. Writes Matthew Continetti for The Washington Free Beacon, “Don't pay attention to what he says. Pay attention to why he's saying it.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Wilmerding’s gamble
- Thou shalt not parse the First: The Connellsville Ten Commandments decision
- The DHS crackdown
- Greensburg Tuesday takes
- The Solyndra scandal: Government culpability
- The liquor debate: ‘Agency shops’? No
- Sunday pops
- The Pa. pensions debate: Union hypocrisy
- Pittsburgh Tuesday takes
- The Kane case: Distractions mount
- Alle-Kiski Tuesday takes