Saturday essay: Move over!
News item: State and local police are on the lookout for aggressive drivers on Route 30, where some motoring maniacs in Westmoreland County think nothing of cruising along at more than 70 mph.
But equal enforcement should apply to those drivers who just can't get out of their own way. To wit: the infamous, ignoble, infuriating left-lane road hogs who amble along oblivious to both common sense and the state law, which prohibits perpetual left-lane cruising.
These selfish lane sitters, typically traveling slower than the flow, refuse to move over — no matter how many cars pass them on the right. They back up traffic needlessly during peak drive times. And the upshot of their inattention? Why, aggression from drivers who get stuck behind them — if not episodes of outright road rage.
Perhaps some of these dolts mistakenly believe that it's their civic duty to slow down other drivers. But they're provoking bad driving from otherwise law-abiding citizens. And that's an accident waiting to happen.
The same applies to 18-wheelers that commandeer the passing lane for miles before making a left turn. They're driving tractor-trailers, not freight trains.
Of course, there's never an excuse for reckless driving — period. But perhaps there would be less of it, at least along Route 30, if more drivers obeyed the state's rules of the road and, for Pete's sake, moved over!
— Bob Pellegrino
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- U.N. Watch: ‘Neutrality’ nonsense
- Immigrant recruitment: Illegals ambush
- EPA pollution: Antics within
- EPA lawlessness: Shut it down
- The Gruber disconnect
- Sunday pops
- The Box
- America the diminished: Cotton candy resolve
- Greensburg Laurels & Lances
- The trouble with SSI: Judging ‘disabilities’
- Yes, Virginia ...