Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
Lance: To Dr. Robert Petzel. The Department of Veterans Affairs' top health official, appearing at The National Press Club in Washington to tout planned tech upgrades, claimed he had a meeting, then stared straight ahead and refused to acknowledge a Trib reporter's questions about the Pittsburgh VA Healthcare System's deadly 2011-12 Legionnaires' disease outbreak. The doctor's reprehensible stonewalling speaks volumes about the VA's arrogance, self-interest, dereliction of its sacred duty to America's veterans and disregard for public accountability.
On the “Watch List”: The Asian tiger mosquito. The Allegheny County Health Department warns that this transmitter of the deadly West Nile virus and other diseases has just been found in Lawrenceville. Seen elsewhere locally in previous seasons, it bites aggressively during daylight hours and can be distinguished from other mosquitoes by its black-and-white striped legs and body. Keep gutters clean and eliminate standing water, as the department recommends, to help minimize this summertime health threat.
Laurel: To the Pirates' winning new wrinkle. Not their stellar on-field record, but the 50/50 raffles new this season at PNC Park and enabled by the state's updated Small Games of Chance Act. They make winners of fans and such Pirates Charities projects as an upcoming Miracle League field for special-needs children in Indiana County. With big crowds drawn by the team's success pushing jackpots well into five figures, it's another way that the Bucs are proving they're winners.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.