Published: Saturday, Aug. 10, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
A new Rasmussen Reports poll shows 74 percent of Americans rarely or never use mass transit. The same poll, however, says they “still tend to believe the government should back mass-transit projects as long as they don't lose money.” But how many mass-transit projects in the United States don't lose money? ... Some of the 2,200 solar panels atop a parking garage at Manchester (N.H.)-Boston Regional Airport have been covered by tarps for the past year because of the glare the sun creates when it strikes them. A federal grant paid for the $3.5 million installation. Now, officials are talking about repositioning the panels. Anybody doubt that the Obama administration will say those hired to fix the first mistake will be engaged in “green jobs”? ... State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki is getting quite the reputation among reporters for doing everything but answering their questions. Oh, she answers but her words are nonsense. To wit, this response when an Associated Press reporter pressed her on whether the Obama administration considers the coup in Egypt a coup or not: “There was a determination made that we need to — not need to make a designation.” Yeah, and who is you are and the geese fly north by eastwest on the seventh Sunday of every month divisible by 5 — but only when crickets run the 440 (hey, we're old school here) in :49.9.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Nelson Mandela: The real legacy
- Detroit’s bankruptcy: An object lesson
- Accord in Geneva: Smelly side deals, too
- ‘China City’
- The Box
- Sunday pops
- ‘Merit selection’ for judges? No thank you
- Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
- The IRS scandal: FBI games
- PSERS time bomb: Tick, tick, tick, tick ...