Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Thursday, Aug. 15, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
On the “Watch List”: H.J. Heinz Co. The anticipation is over at the ketchup giant — it has fired nearly one-third of its Pittsburgh headquarters staff mere months after going private. Job cuts were expected but, perhaps, the large number of cuts were not. The new bosses say they remain committed to keeping Pittsburgh as their headquarters. Saying is one thing; doing it will be another.
Laurel: To Tom Corbett. The governor is urging UPMC and Highmark to shelve their negative advertising campaign against each other and focus on serving the public. Now there's a novel idea.
Lance: To Paul Wood. UPMC's spokesman says Gov. Corbett's entreaty was an endorsement of UPMC's stance. Once a spinner, always a spinner.
Lance: To Oliver Byrd. The interim director of the August Wilson Center for African American Culture says the financially flagging facility is experiencing growing pains. It has a nearly $2 million deficit, its attendance is dropping and it wants more public money. Sounds like failing pains to us.
An observation: The HOV gates on the Parkway North had yet another series of glitches this week, which, of course, only negate the value of the HOV lanes. And gate glitches are a semi-regular event. What, pray tell, is so difficult about keeping these gates glitch-free?
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Junk nutrition
- The secret ballot: Protect it
- Lever A-1: Pot-infused brownies
- The big sting: To what end?
- Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
- Keystone caper: Pipeline politics
- Sunday pops
- Greensburg Laurels & Lances
- Liquor privatization: Now’s the time
- Easter 2014: Churches’ vital role
- Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances