This is a 'moderate'?
Published: Tuesday, Aug. 13, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Naming a general who figured prominently in the 1983 bombing that killed 241 American servicemen in Lebanon as his defense minister and other appointments he has made confirm that new Iranian President Hassan Rowhani is anything but the “moderate” that some gullible Western observers have claimed.
The Washington Free Beacon reports that Mr. Rowhani's defense-minister choice is Gen. Hussein Dehqan. A career Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) member, the general spent years building Hezbollah in Lebanon, says retired Israeli Brig. Gen. Shimon Shapiro, an authority on Hezbollah and a former top intelligence official who wrote a recent Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs report on Mr. Dehqan.
Mr. Shapiro says it was Dehqan, then commanding IRGC forces in Lebanon, who received the order from Tehran that resulted in the dastardly 1983 Beirut bombings of not just the U.S. Marine barracks but also French paratroopers' barracks, where 84 died.
Rowhani also has chosen a Holocaust denier to be his foreign minister. His intelligence minister has spoken of not backing down in the face of U.S. and allied “arrogance.” And Rowhani lately has called Israel a “wound” in the Middle East and stoked Iran's nuclear ambitions.
These are the actions of a radical Islamist elected president with the blessing of Tehran's ruling elite, not a “moderate” — and U.S. policy toward Iran must be shaped accordingly, not by illusory wishes and hopes.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- ObamaCare: HIT’s hit
- On regulatory ‘autopilot’: Anchors on the economy
- The Thursday wrap
- ‘China City’
- Detroit’s bankruptcy: An object lesson
- The Monsour monstrosity
- ObamaCare & minimum wages: A double whammy
- Anti-fracking scandal: More junk ‘science’
- Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
- Saturday essay: A special tinsel
- Christmas in Connellsville: Catch the spirit