Investing in Connellsville: One man's commitment
Published: Friday, Aug. 16, 2013, 8:57 p.m.
There's new excitement in Connellsville. Residents are waiting to see what will happen to the once-magnificent Aaron's Building. For 30 some years, the old furniture store has sat empty along North Pittsburgh Street.
Residents and several city administrations long hoped that someone would take a chance and restore the century-old building to its original beauty. But with each brick that fell from the structure, hope faded.
Connellsville owes a debt of gratitude to local businessman Terry “Tuffy” Shallenberger. Mr. Shallenberger recently reached a deal with the city and took ownership of the building. He's willing to take a risk — not only on the building's renovation but on the Connellsville community itself.
Shallenberger said he believes in Connellsville. He wants to do what he can to restore the community's vitality.
And Shallenberger is taking that belief to heart.
He also has been instrumental in the construction of the train-display building on Crawford Avenue, which, when it opens, will hopefully draw tourists to Connellsville. Never mind the number of times he has reached out to help various Connellsville organizations.
We should all follow Shallenberger's example. No, all of us can't buy buildings and renovate them, but there are little things we can do — help with cleanups in town or pitch in with various volunteer community-support organizations.
By working together, we can make Connellsville a better place.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Nelson Mandela: The real legacy
- ‘China City’
- Detroit’s bankruptcy: An object lesson
- Anti-fracking scandal: More junk ‘science’
- Sunday pops
- The Box