| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Samantha Power and the United Nations

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

Sunday, Aug. 18, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

When the applause subsides and she gets down to work, how will Samantha Power engage any meaningful “reforms” at the United Nations as America's newest and youngest ambassador?

In her first public address as ambassador, Ms. Power, 42, urged her UCLA audience to “demand more of (the U.N.) to make it work better, to build the world that we envision.”

Sorry, but as “world visions” go, the U.N. has its own. And it's strikingly similar to Power's.

Since joining the U.N.'s in-name-only Human Rights Council, the Obama administration has remained nonconfrontational on major rights issues, reports Brett D. Schaefer of The Heritage Foundation. It's doubtful Power will do much to “reform” the Israel-bashing council when, in a 2002 interview, she accused Israeli leaders of “destroying the lives of their own people.”

Never mind congressional demands for more accountability and transparency in U.N. budgets, which go nowhere. And U.N. peacekeeping missions that have no measurable effect but one: The cost of “peacekeeping” keeps rising for U.S. taxpayers.

To this world forum, the Obama administration sends an ambassador who in 2003 called for “a historical reckoning with crimes committed, sponsored or permitted by the United States.”

Given that mindset, Power should fit in quite well at today's United Nations. This, when the U.S. should find that “fit” more intolerable than ever.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. Greensburg Laurels & Lances
  2. Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
  3. The Iranian deal: Mortal blessings
  4. Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances
  5. Fresh produce solution
  6. The Thursday wrap
  7. Greensburg Tuesday takes
  8. Trumpeting ObamaCare: The Medicaid factor
  9. Wilmerding’s gamble
  10. Thou shalt not parse the First: The Connellsville Ten Commandments decision
  11. State of Corruption: Jim Short’s plea