ShareThis Page

The Thursday wrap

| Wednesday, Aug. 21, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Highmark Inc. blows it with its latest TV ad against UPMC. Oh, the facts appear to be A-OK but the affectatious laughs of the woman reciting those facts are totally out of place for such a serious subject. UPMC's out-of-network charges are no laughing matter. ... The Economist reports that one of the reasons the Justice Department filed an antitrust lawsuit to block the merger of American Airlines with US Airways is that it suspects the new American had designs to later merge with United Airlines. That would have left only three major U.S. carriers and even less choice for the flying public. Let's see if that little tidbit comes out if the lawsuit actually goes to trial. ... A funny thing happened on the way to Obama & Co.'s “grassroots” effort claiming “climate change” is wreaking all manner of weather havoc. The website notes that we typically have about 1,200 tornadoes by this time each year. But this year, there have been only about 720 reported twisters. What's a climate clucker to do? ... Longtime Trib feature obituary writer Jerry Vondas, a veteran Pittsburgh journalist who spent 45 years chronicling our lives and our deaths, died Tuesday. He was 83. Jerry was a friend to all and all were his friends. And there are scores of reporters and editors in this region who can thank him for more than a few history lessons. Rest in peace, Jerry.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.