| Opinion/The Review

Larger text Larger text Smaller text Smaller text | Order Photo Reprints

Obama's de-stimulus

Email Newsletters

Click here to sign up for one of our email newsletters.

Letters home ...

Traveling abroad for personal, educational or professional reasons?

Why not share your impressions — and those of residents of foreign countries about the United States — with Trib readers in 150 words?

The world's a big place. Bring it home with Letters Home.

Contact Colin McNickle (412-320-7836 or

Daily Photo Galleries

Sunday, Aug. 25, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Before Americans buy President Obama's pitch for a $50 billion infrastructure stimulus and accompanying tax increase, they should take a closer look at what happened to the $70.6 billion “investment” under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

The Mercatus Center at George Mason University did, and what researchers found was no boom in new jobs. Instead, “stimulus dollars created more job shifting than actual new jobs.”

Moreover, “(W)e found no evidence that funds were successfully targeted at areas of the economy with high unemployment,” said Daniel Rothschild, co-author of the study.

And worse still, some states like Maryland took the federal cash and cut their infrastructure budgets, The Heritage Foundation reports. In other cases, stimulus dollars were used to cover general expenses.

And consider those instances in which stimulus spending actually stymied economic growth. Such as how federal money, with a raft of regulations, stalled the construction of two new fire stations in San Antonio, Texas. Subsequently, the private builder who had been hired for the job lost the contract — and ended up laying off employees.

And while Mr. Obama endorses more senseless taxing and spending, he sits steadfast on a guaranteed job creator: the Keystone XL oil pipeline from Canada.

Repackaging and recycling the same failed ideas won't jump-start an economic policy that's out of gas.

Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.



Show commenting policy

Most-Read Editorials

  1. U.N. Watch: Chelsea’s words
  3. How to counter Putin in Syria
  4. The Kane case: Charges upon charges
  5. The Box
  6. Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
  7. Sunday pops
  8. Tower of babble
  9. Seattle’s gun violence tax: A 2nd Amendment potshot
  10. ‘80 by 50’?: This extreme climate proposal is a big zero
  11. Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances