China today: Yesterday once more
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Saturday, Aug. 24, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Tempering any optimism about China's Communist Party loosening its repressive grip on its people — and about Western values taking root there along with capitalist-style economics — is new President Xi Jinping's embrace of Mao Zedong's legacy.
The Wall Street Journal reports that Mr. Xi, installed during last fall's once-a-decade leadership transition, in July opened an exhibit at Chairman Mao's lakeside summer villa, saying it should educate young Chinese about patriotism and revolution. Of course, the exhibit omits the millions who died under Mao's rule.
Visiting a village from which Mao attacked Beijing in 1949, Xi vowed that “our red nation will never change color.” He has launched a party purification effort reminiscent of Mao's “rectification” campaigns and ordered officials to keep “seven serious problems” including universal values, press freedom, civil society and judicial independence from spreading. State media are attacking the notion that China's constitution should limit the party's power. And dozens of political activists have been detained.
So much for Western hopes that with new Chinese leadership confronting a slowing economy and an increasingly restive public, Beijing somehow would embrace Western-style respect for human rights, individual liberties and the rule of law along with capitalist economics. America and its allies must treat China as the hostile, authoritarian state that it is, not as what wishful Western thinking would make it out to be.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Sunday pops
- THE BOX
- The big sting: To what end?
- Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances
- Keystone caper: Pipeline politics